June 24, 1999
"I am planning to
shop for the best deal on a refinance. Should I shop my present lender
first?"
No, shop your present lender
last. Shop other lenders first, then challenge your lender to beat the
best deal you find elsewhere. Your present lender may be in a position to
waive some settlement costs because you are an existing customer, but you
won't know if you are getting the benefit of this unless you shop
elsewhere first.
In a refinance market,
lenders are conflicted with regard to how they treat their existing
borrowers. They don�t want to encourage any of their borrowers to
refinance who might otherwise not get around to it. On the other hand, if
they know that a borrower is going to refinance regardless, they want the
new loan. To get it, many lenders have what are called
"retention" programs, which are designed to recapture as many as
possible of those borrowers who are determined to refinance, without
putting any refinance ideas into the heads of other borrowers.
Distinguishing the two groups is not easy, but there are ways.
For example, if you call your
lender to find out the exact balance of your loan and your lender has a
retention program, you will quickly receive a call from its loan
origination department offering to refinance your loan. A balance inquiry
usually means the borrower is looking to refinance.
The lender to whom you are
now remitting your payments may be in a position to offer you lower
settlement costs than a new lender, but this can vary from case to case.
The greatest potential for lower settlement costs arises where the current
lender was the originating lender which still owns your loan, a common
situation with loans made by banks and savings and loan associations. If
your payment record has been good, the lender may forgo a credit report,
property appraisal, title search and other risk control procedures that
are otherwise mandatory on new loans. This is strictly up to the lender.
Indeed, if you are not
looking to take any cash out of the transaction and are looking only to
reduce the interest rate, the lender may elect simply to reduce the
interest rate on your current loan rather than refinance. This
avoids all settlement costs.
If the lender to whom you are
now remitting your payments is the originating lender but no longer owns
the loan, the potential for lower settlement costs is less. In this case,
your lender does not have the same discretion to forego settlement
procedures but must follow the guidelines laid down by the owner of the
loan. If the loan had earlier been sold to one of the Federal secondary
market agencies, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, the guidelines are theirs.
While both agencies have provisions for "streamlined refinancing
documentation", the discretion granted the lender, and therefore the
potential cost savings, is quite limited.
The potential for lower
settlement costs is least when the lender to whom you are now remitting
your payments is neither the originating lender or the current owner. This
is a fairly common situation that arises when the contract to service the
loan is sold. In this case, your lender may not be in a position to use
all of the streamlined refinancing procedures because its files do not
contain some of the information those procedures require, such as the
original appraisal report.
The greater the potential for
lower settlement costs from dealing with your present lender, the more
likely that that lender can offer you the best terms. Which doesn't
necessarily mean that it will. The reason for going to your present lender
last is to make sure that you receive the benefit of any cost
reductions. Remember, mortgages are a big-ticket item and the terms
posted by lenders are not engraved in stone. Do not be afraid to haggle.
Postscript, April 15,
2003
A point that should have been
stressed above is that when lenders take the initiative in soliciting
their own customers, they may base their offer on the borrower's existing
rate. This means that in a 5% market, the borrower with a 7%
mortgage might be offered 6% while an otherwise identical borrower with a
6% mortgage might be offered 5.5%. The goal is to provide an
attractive saving over the existing loan while giving up as little as
possible.
An even worst hazard of going
to your own lender is illustrated by this letter.
"I filled out all the
forms to refinance my loan [with the existing lender], paid the $350
lock-in fee, provided all the documents they asked for...But it is now 4
months and still it hasn't closed...I call the person in charge of my
refinancing, and he says he will get back to me, and he never
does... What do you think could be the problem?"
The problem, of course, is
that the lender already has a loan at a higher rate, and has no incentive
to close the new one. While it probably is not deliberate, in a
refinance boom lenders get behind in loan processing and have to set
priorities. If you have your choice of processing a loan you will
likely lose if you don't get it done quickly, or a loan you can't lose
because you already own it, the choice is all too easy.
Copyright Jack Guttentag
2003
|